Lexical Pianist

chronicluciddaydreamer:

poorartists:

Paige Bradley created one of the most striking sculptures I’ve seen in recent times. Her masterpiece, entitled Expansion, is a beautiful woman seeking inner piece but fractured and bleeding with light.
“From the moment we are born, the world tends to have a container already built for us to fit inside: a social security number, a gender, a race, a profession,” says Bradley. “I ponder if we are more defined by the container we are in than what we are inside. Would we recognize ourselves if we could expand beyond our bodies?”

Fantastic.

Beautiful beyond words.  The embodiment of the word “aesthic” IMHO.

chronicluciddaydreamer:

poorartists:

Paige Bradley created one of the most striking sculptures I’ve seen in recent times. Her masterpiece, entitled Expansion, is a beautiful woman seeking inner piece but fractured and bleeding with light.

“From the moment we are born, the world tends to have a container already built for us to fit inside: a social security number, a gender, a race, a profession,” says Bradley. “I ponder if we are more defined by the container we are in than what we are inside. Would we recognize ourselves if we could expand beyond our bodies?”

Fantastic.

Beautiful beyond words.  The embodiment of the word “aesthic” IMHO.

Political and Personal Convictions

     I will admit openly to anyone that asks—and down here in the south that really says something—that, politically speaking, I lean to the left.  Even though I do not follow the beliefs and convictions of the right, I genuinely and sincerely hope that I continue to be the kind of person that can listen to someone with different convictions than my own, even and especially those that are in direct conflict and with them. 

     The thing that bothers me so much about reading a post titled The Hypocrisy of the Left and other similar articles, is not so much that they are in such conflict with my own convictions.  Rather it is that I know the author of said post would not be interested in hearing anyone’s explanation for why they disagree with him or her.  Those who are inclined to the right are not the only ones guilty of this charge, hence the existence of equivalent articles titled The Hypocrisy of the Right, and more specifically the author of such an article, who would be unwilling to listen to anything in contradiction to his or her beliefs. 

     Am I the only one who feels like I could hold a political conversation with someone of an opposing view and not stoop to the level of purposefully insulting their convictions, and not only that—and stay with me here, I know this is unfathomable to some of you—but actually listen to what they have to say, with the intent of learning something new from them, that I may not have learned by listening those that are preaching what I want to hear?

     I think part of the reason it is so difficult to keep from stooping to that level, and hence why so very many Americans do, is because it seems to be a rare occasion when I meet someone who is capable of it themselves.  I think, however, it is even more important that I refuse to interrupt them when they say something that may be personally insulting, but continue to listen with the intent of understanding how it is that my fellow American, who, like myself, is interested in what is good for the country (hopefully, and less hopefully only in what is best for themselves), came to a different understanding of how things stand in our country, and how things ought to be done in our country.  Maybe by remaining strong and insisting on having a productive, and potentially even pleasant, political conversation with someone holding conflicting views with my own.  I believe this is the difficult but necessary path to further unification amongst Americans of different backgrounds, cultures, beliefs, ethnicities, orientations, and political convictions.  I will continue in my audacity to hope that bridging the chasm-like divide between the right and the left is in fact possible, and I will the best I can to do my part.  

A house divided against itself cannot stand.—Abraham Lincoln

sapphireblues:

Obama discusses LGBT Pride Month

This is incredibly beautiful and severely important. 

Amen!

(Said to my friend she came out of the bathroom) “You look so pretty.  I mean, you look like you feel nice, and that’s pretty to me.”

WHAT IS THIS. I DON'T EVEN.

chronicluciddaydreamer:

jonathanlivingstonseagull:

a-rambling-shadow:

rikibatista:

Religious leaders slammed the state’s new gay marriage law on Saturday, vowing to ban politicians who supported the measure from any Catholic church and parochial school events.

The city’s top Catholic clergy released strongly worded statements in the hours after the state Senate voted 33-29 to legalize gay unions.

THE NIGHT THE STATE SENATE SAID YES TO GAY MARRIAGE

Bishop Nicholas DiMarzio, of the diocese of Brooklyn, called on all Catholic schools to reject any honor bestowed upon them by Gov. Cuomo, who played a pivotal role in getting the bill passed.

He further asked all pastors and principals to “not invite any state legislator to speak or be present at any parish or school celebration.”

“This is a further erosion of the real understanding of marriage,” DiMarzio told the Daily News. “The state should not be concerned about regulating affection.”

“I believe the passage of same-sex marriage is another ‘nail in the coffin’ of marriage,” DeMarzio wrote in an essay posted at NYDailyNews.com.

“It is destructive because we fail to view marriage in the context of a vocation: a calling to participate in the great enterprise of forming the next generation. Marriage is reduced to an empty honor,” he wrote. “That there was virtually no public debate on the issue and that the entire matter was concluded in just over 30 minutes late on a Friday evening is disgraceful.”

New York Archbishop Timothy Dolan said he was “very disappointed, very saddened and very worried” by the developments that will allow same-sex partners to legally wed.

“I think for anybody, especially state government, to tamper with something as sacred and timeless and as much a part of the human condition as marriage is careless,” Dolan said.

…I’m going to throw some bitches off a bridge. :|

I am having some serious problems with US society at the moment, so I am going to need to spend a great deal of time with my Rushmore DVD.

This makes me so angry, and sad. There are so many logical holes in these arguments that it is laughable to even accept them as real statements. But they are real enough to hurt real people. What bothers me the most is that same-sex marriage is even debated. It shouldn’t even BE a fight. Much like the right of women to vote, and the rights of African-Americans to be free, should not have been a fight. The truth should stand alone. Arguing against it should be laughed at publicly, yet for some reason we are still fighting. It is enough to make you a pessimist. :/

Borneo Deforestation
So I was listening to National Public Radio (as I often do when  driving) and heard an interview with a Malaysian politician involving  the deforestation of the rain forest on the Island of Borneo.  
For those of you who don’t remember every detail of your high school  geography class, Borneo is a large island approximately halfway between  China and Austrailia, with the Indian Ocean to the west and the Pacific  to its east and is surrounded by the thousands of islands that comprise  Indonesia.  The island of Borneo itself is the only island in the world  that is owned by three different nations (excluding Antarctica—I don’t  think that’s really considered an island though? *shrugs*): Indonesia,  Malaysia, and Brunei.  I believe the island is actually the third  largest island in the world.  
Evidently the world’s oldest rain forest (over seventy millions years  older than the Amazon) and home to all sorts of wildlife that exist  nowhere else, the island is being pillaged for its timber in Malaysia’s  effort to become a more developed country, the timber being their  industrial resource.  
I was really bothered by this and have hence posted some information for your own knowledge/awareness.  Click the picture!

Borneo Deforestation

So I was listening to National Public Radio (as I often do when driving) and heard an interview with a Malaysian politician involving the deforestation of the rain forest on the Island of Borneo.  

For those of you who don’t remember every detail of your high school geography class, Borneo is a large island approximately halfway between China and Austrailia, with the Indian Ocean to the west and the Pacific to its east and is surrounded by the thousands of islands that comprise Indonesia.  The island of Borneo itself is the only island in the world that is owned by three different nations (excluding Antarctica—I don’t think that’s really considered an island though? *shrugs*): Indonesia, Malaysia, and Brunei.  I believe the island is actually the third largest island in the world.  

Evidently the world’s oldest rain forest (over seventy millions years older than the Amazon) and home to all sorts of wildlife that exist nowhere else, the island is being pillaged for its timber in Malaysia’s effort to become a more developed country, the timber being their industrial resource.  

I was really bothered by this and have hence posted some information for your own knowledge/awareness.  Click the picture!